4.6 Article

Sorption of Se(-II) on illite, MX-80 bentonite, shale, and limestone in Na-Ca-Cl solutions

期刊

NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 54, 期 5, 页码 1616-1622

出版社

KOREAN NUCLEAR SOC
DOI: 10.1016/j.net.2021.10.039

关键词

Sorption; 2SPNE SC; CE model; PHREEQC; Geological disposal; Selenium; Saline solution; Reducing conditions; Sorption distribution coefficient

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the sorption behavior of selenium onto various solid materials under different ionic strength and pH conditions. The results indicate that the sorption of selenium is minimally affected by ionic strength, while different materials exhibit varying sorption effects.
Selenium has been identified as an element of interest for the safety assessment of a deep geological repository (DGR) for used nuclear fuel. In Canada, groundwaters at DGR depths in sedimentary rocks have been observed to have a high ionic strength. This paper examines the sorption behavior of Se(-II) onto illite, MX-80 bentonite, Queenston shale, and argillaceous limestone in Na-Ca-Cl solutions of varying ionic strength (0.1-6 mol/kgw (m)) and across a pH range of 4-9. Little ionic strength dependence for Se(-II) sorption onto all solids was observed except that sorption at high ionic strength (6 m) was generally slightly lower than sorption at low ionic strength (0.1 m). Illite and MX-80 exhibited the expected results for anion sorption, while shale and limestone exhibited more constant sorption across the pH range tested. A non-electrostatic surface complexation model successfully predicted sorption of Se(-II) onto illite and MX-80 using the formation of an inner-sphere surface complex and an outer-sphere surface complex. Optimized values for the formation reactions of these surface species were proposed. (c) 2022 Korean Nuclear Society, Published by Elsevier Korea LLC. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据