4.6 Review

A meta-analysis of responses of C3 plants to atmospheric CO2: dose-response curves for 85 traits ranging from the molecular to the whole-plant level

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 233, 期 4, 页码 1560-1596

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.17802

关键词

acclimation; dose-response curve; global change; light intensity; meta-analysis; plasticity; reaction norm

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A meta-analysis of 630 experiments was conducted to derive dose-response curves for 85 phenotypic traits of C-3 plants grown at different CO2 concentrations. The results show that plants exhibit diverse responses to atmospheric CO2, with some traits doubling in response while others halve or exhibit opposite responses.
Generalised dose-response curves are essential to understand how plants acclimate to atmospheric CO2. We carried out a meta-analysis of 630 experiments in which C-3 plants were experimentally grown at different [CO2] under relatively benign conditions, and derived dose-response curves for 85 phenotypic traits. These curves were characterised by form, plasticity, consistency and reliability. Considered over a range of 200-1200 mu mol mol(-1) CO2, some traits more than doubled (e.g. area-based photosynthesis; intrinsic water-use efficiency), whereas others more than halved (area-based transpiration). At current atmospheric [CO2], 64% of the total stimulation in biomass over the 200-1200 mu mol mol(-1) range has already been realised. We also mapped the trait responses of plants to [CO2] against those we have quantified before for light intensity. For most traits, CO2 and light responses were of similar direction. However, some traits (such as reproductive effort) only responded to light, others (such as plant height) only to [CO2], and some traits (such as area-based transpiration) responded in opposite directions. This synthesis provides a comprehensive picture of plant responses to [CO2] at different integration levels and offers the quantitative dose-response curves that can be used to improve global change simulation models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据