4.6 Article

Microbiome profiling reveals that Pseudomonas antagonises parasitic nodule colonisation of cheater rhizobia in Lotus

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 234, 期 1, 页码 242-255

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.17988

关键词

ineffective nodules; Lotus; Mesorhizobium; microbiome; Pseudomonas; root-nodule symbiosis

资金

  1. German Research Foundation [MA 7269/2-1, Schl446/38-1]
  2. ProjektDEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nodule microbiota, primarily consisting of symbiotic nitrogen-fixing rhizobia, are influenced by other non-rhizobial bacteria, which may impact root-nodule symbiosis in a plant host-specific manner.
Nodule microbiota are dominated by symbiotic nitrogen-fixing rhizobia, however, other non-rhizobial bacteria also colonise this niche. Although many of these bacteria harbour plant-growth-promoting functions, it is not clear whether these less abundant nodule colonisers impact root-nodule symbiosis. We assessed the relationship between the nodule microbiome and nodulation as influenced by the soil microbiome, by using a metabarcoding approach to characterise the communities inside nodules of healthy and starved Lotus species. A machine learning algorithm and network analyses were used to identify nodule bacteria of interest, which were re-inoculated onto plants in controlled conditions to observe their potential functionality. The nodule microbiome of all tested species differed according to inoculum, but only that of Lotus burttii varied with plant health. Amplicon sequence variants representative of Pseudomonas species were the most indicative non-rhizobial signatures inside healthy L. burttii nodules and negatively correlated with Rhizobium sequences. A representative Pseudomonas isolate co-colonised nodules infected with a beneficial Mesorhizobium, but not with an ineffective Rhizobium isolate and another even reduced the number of ineffective nodules induced on Lotus japonicus. Our results show that nodule endophytes influence the overall outcome of the root-nodule symbiosis, albeit in a plant host-specific manner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据