4.6 Article

Protein turnover in the developing Triticum aestivum grain

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 233, 期 3, 页码 1188-1201

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.17756

关键词

protein degradation; protein synthesis costs; protein turnover; storage proteins; wheat grain

资金

  1. Research Training Programme Fee Offset - International Student and UWA Safety-Net Top-Up Scholarships
  2. Australian Research Council [CE140100008, FL200100057]
  3. Australian Research Council [FL200100057] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study shows a spatiotemporal pattern to protein turnover rates during wheat grain development, and calculates the costs of protein turnover along with identifying the most and the least stable proteins in the developing wheat grain.
Protein abundance in cereal grains is determined by the relative rates of protein synthesis and protein degradation during grain development but quantitation of these rates is lacking. Through combining in vivo stable isotope labelling and in-depth quantitative proteomics, we have measured the turnover of 1400 different types of proteins during wheat grain development. We demonstrate that there is a spatiotemporal pattern to protein turnover rates which explain part of the variation in protein abundances that is not attributable to differences in wheat gene expression. We show that c. 20% of total grain adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production is used for grain proteome biogenesis and maintenance, and nearly half of this budget is invested exclusively in storage protein synthesis. We calculate that 25% of newly synthesized storage proteins are turned over during grain development rather than stored. This approach to measure protein turnover rates at proteome scale reveals how different functional categories of grain proteins accumulate, calculates the costs of protein turnover during wheat grain development and identifies the most and the least stable proteins in the developing wheat grain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据