4.6 Article

Real-space effects of a quench in the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model and elusive dynamical appearance of the topological edge states

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
卷 24, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/ac3cf6

关键词

quantum quench; Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model; symmetry protected topological states; charge conjugation symmetry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For a half-filled SSH chain, the occupancy of each lattice site remains unchanged for any parameter quench due to the additional time-reversal and charge conjugation symmetries. However, a suitably designed local quench can break these additional symmetries and induce real-space dynamical effects, exhibiting different features in the topological and trivial phases.
The topological phase of the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) model is known to exhibit two edge states that are topologically protected by the chiral symmetry. We demonstrate that, for any parameter quench performed on the half-filled SSH chain, the occupancy of each lattice site remains locked to 1/2 at any time, due to the additional time-reversal and charge conjugation symmetries. In particular, for a quench from the trivial to the topological phase, no signature of the topological edge states appears in real-space occupancies, independently of the quench protocol, the temperature of the pre-quench thermal state or the presence of chiral disorder. However, a suitably designed local quench from/to a SSH ring threaded by a magnetic flux can break these additional symmetries while preserving the chiral one. Then, real-space effects of the quench do appear and exhibit different dynamical features in the topological and in the trivial phases. Moreover, when the particle filling is different from a half and the pre-quench state is not insulating, the dynamical appearance of the topological edge states is visible already in a chain, it survives time averaging and can be observed also in the presence of chiral-breaking disorder and for instantaneous quenches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据