4.6 Article

Identify spin property of relativistic electrons in fully relativistic laser fields

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
卷 23, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/ac4055

关键词

strong-field QED; relativistic quantum mechanics; spin operators

资金

  1. Science Challenging Project [TZ2018005]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12135001, 11825502, 11921006, 11725314, 11903019, 11833003, 12041306]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA25050900]
  4. National Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholars [11825502]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A semiclassical method is developed to study the spin evolution of a relativistic electron in a fully relativistic laser pulse, showing deviations from the classical method in terms of spin operator mean values. The study also proposes an experimental setup utilizing an asymmetric field of a single-cycle laser to observe the total change of spin easily after interaction.
A semiclassical method is developed to study the spin evolution of a relativistic electron in an fully relativistic laser pulse. Different from the previous classical method which is based on the direct generalization of nonrelativistic spin precession equation, we perform first-principle calculations on the mean values of various spin operators with respect to a relativistic electron wave packet. It is demonstrated, via theoretical derivation and numerical simulation, that although the Foldy-Wouthuysen operator merits the single-particle interpretation, its mean value obviously deviates from the result of the classical method, which sheds light on not only the understanding of relativistic spin itself but also broad related applications. To achieve a direct observation of such effect, a feasible experimental setup utilizing the asymmetric field of a single-cycle laser is proposed. In such geometry, the deviation is evidenced in the total change of spin which can be easily measured after the interaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据