4.6 Article

Photo-controlled self-assembly behavior of novel amphiphilic polymers with a rosin-based azobenzene group

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 46, 期 3, 页码 1399-1408

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1nj04575j

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31901261]
  2. Discipline Group Construction Project of CAFICIFP [LHSXKQ1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel rosin-based photo-responsive amphiphilic polymers were synthesized with PEG and AZOMPA, showing high photoresponsive efficiency and morphological changes for polymers with different chain lengths. UV irradiation triggered structural transformation and release of loaded probes for these bola amphiphilic polymers.
Novel 'bola' rosin-based photo-responsive amphiphilic polymers PMPn (n = 17, 34, or 69) were synthesized using poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) as a double hydrophilic head and N-azobenzenemaleimidepimaric acid (AZOMPA) as a hydrophobic tail. The relatively fixed position of the rigid group of rosin can reduce the entanglement of PEG chains and enhance the influence of the cis-isomerization of azobenzene on the volume and polarity of the entire polymer. Consequently, all polymers with different chain lengths show an extremely high photoresponsive efficiency and various morphological changes. For the PMP17 and PMP34 assemblies, collapse of the sphere micelles takes place upon UV irradiation and this process is reversible; by contrast, the PMP69 assemblies transformed from worm micelles to large spherical micelles, cloud-like micelles, large composite micelles and irregular spherical micelles. Subsequently, encapsulation of the hydrophobic fluorescent probe Nile red and as well as its release from the loaded probes triggered by UV irradiation were evaluated. The UV irradiation experiments demonstrated the photoresponsive behavior of the bola amphiphilic polymers PMPn containing the rigid rosin-based azobenzene group, giving an elegant strategy for design of stimuli-responsive materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据