4.6 Article

UV-absorbing benzamide-based dendrimer precursors: synthesis, theoretical calculation, and spectroscopic characterization

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 46, 期 1, 页码 75-85

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1nj04366h

关键词

-

资金

  1. King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ability to tune the structural properties of dendrimers with respect to size, polarity, and terminal functionalities makes them highly attractive for potential biological and catalytic applications. The synthesized Janus (J) and Twin (T) benzamide-based branched structures were characterized using spectroscopic and theoretical techniques, revealing the orientation of aliphatic chains and linkage configurations. UV-Vis spectra showed consistent absorption around 290 nm, with assigned prominent bands correlating with the molecules' structural and electronic aspects.
The ability to tune the structural properties with respect to size, polarity, and terminal functionalities makes dendrimers a highly attractive class of compounds with potential biological and catalytic applications. In the present study, Janus (J) and Twin (T) benzamide-based branched structures were synthesized from a primary precursor of methyl gallate and then further characterized using spectroscopic and theoretical techniques. The optimized structures of these dendrimer precursors at the B3LYP/6-311G(d) level revealed that the aliphatic chains in the most stable forms are oriented in the least strained arrangement with the (-benzene-O-CH2-) linkage adopting the phenol-like configuration. UV-Vis spectra showed a consistent absorption at nearly 290 nm, suggesting that both molecules absorb within the ultraviolet region and are colorless. Prominent bands, which include the -OH vibrational stretch, the -C = C- stretch, the -C = O stretch, the -C-O in-plane stretch, and the -NH in-plane bending, were assigned and correlated with the structural and electronic aspects of the molecules.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据