4.6 Article

Diverse roof shaped chiral diamidophosphites: palladium coordination and catalytic applications

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 46, 期 4, 页码 1751-1762

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1nj05143a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [19-13-00197]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [19-13-00197] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of diamidophosphite ligands with various structures and denticities were synthesized and utilized in the synthesis of Pd(II) allylic complexes with high enantioselectivity. The effects of the diamidophosphite moiety and the denticity of the ligands on catalytic activity and enantioselectivity were investigated through experiments.
A series of diamidophosphite ligands of various structures and denticities were synthesized from (11S,12S)-bis(hydroxymethyl)-9,10-dihydro-9,10-ethanoanthracene as a roof shaped 1,4-diol. On the basis of these ligands, we obtained three types of Pd(II) allylic complexes: a P,P-chelate, a P,S-bridged head-to-tail dinuclear complex, and complexes each containing a pair of P-monodentately coordinated P-, P,N- or P,S-ligands. The structures of the ligands and their complexes were determined using 2D NMR spectroscopy. Four diamidophosphites were also characterized via their X-ray structural data. This kind of stereoselector exhibited up to 98% ee in the Pd-mediated allylic substitution of (E)-1,3-diphenylallyl acetate with C- and N-nucleophiles. In the Pd-catalyzed allylic alkylation of cinnamyl acetate with various C-nucleophiles, ee values of up to 90% were obtained. In addition, up to 71% ee was achieved in the Pd-catalyzed asymmetric amination of 2-(diethoxyphosphoryl)-1-phenylallyl acetate with aniline, which is a pioneering example of diamidophosphite-type ligand involvement in this challenging reaction. The effects of the diamidophosphite moiety and the denticity of the ligands on the catalytic activity and enantioselectivity were investigated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据