Pupil dilation as an index of Pavlovian conditioning. A systematic review and meta-analysis

The use of pupillometry to track emotional learning processes in humans is generating an increasing interest. Here, we provide a first systematic review and meta-analysis on the value of pupil dilation as a marker of Pavlovian conditioning, focusing on the roles of UCS valence (aversive vs. appetitive), the time course across trials and response intervals within trials. Based on data from 39 independent samples (total n = 1303), our results revealed strong evidence for the overall validity of conditioned pupil responses, with a trend for larger effects in aversive (average g = 0.73) vs. appetitive conditioning (g = 0.39). Response differentiation increased over the course of acquisition. Substantial differentiation effects were found in both early and late response windows. Moderator analyses revealed a consistent influence of UCS modality on differential conditioning, while evidence for moderation by contingency instructions and length of acquisition phase was mixed. The results highlight pupil dilation as a sensitive and reliable index of Pavlovian conditioning across valence categories and stimulus modalities. Important implications regarding methodological considerations and research goals are discussed.

Automated summary

This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of pupil dilation as a marker of Pavlovian conditioning in emotional learning processes in humans. Results from 39 independent samples with a total of 1303 participants showed strong evidence for the validity of conditioned pupil responses, with larger effects in aversive conditioning compared to appetitive conditioning. Response differentiation increased over the course of acquisition, with substantial effects found in both early and late response windows.