4.5 Article

WS6 Induces Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis in Correlation to its Antidepressant Effect on the Alleviation of Depressive-like Behaviors of Rats

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE
卷 473, 期 -, 页码 119-129

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.08.020

关键词

chronic unpredictable mild stress; major depressive disorder; neurogenesis; WS6

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81870844, 81701260, 82001167, 21878022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

WS6 treatment shows promising neuroprotective and antidepressant-like effects against CUMS-induced depression, possibly through promoting neurogenesis in the hippocampus.
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the most common psychiatric disorders. However, the effective drugs for MDD have not yet been developed. WS6 is originally designed with a similar structure as Resveratrol and Pterostilbene. The present study aims to investigate the neuroprotective and ameliorating effects of WS6 treatment in a rat model of chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) induced depression. The results show that CUMS is effective in producing depressive-like behavior in rats as indicated by decreased responses in the loco motor activity, sucrose preference test and increased immobility time. However, WS6 treatment significantly ameliorated these behavioral alterations associated with CUMS-induced depression. Moreover, the reduction in neurogenesis, GABAergic neurons, dendrite complexity, spine density and synaptic plasticity-associate protein 95 (PSD95) by CUMS can be reversed by treatment with WS6. Taken together, this study highlights the neuroprotective and antidepressant-like effects of WS6 against CUMS-induced depression, and suggest a possible mechanism for this protection via changes in neurogenesis within the hippocampus. These finding reveal the therapeutic protection of WS6 for use in clinical trials in the treatment of neuronal deterioration in MDD. (c) 2021 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据