4.8 Article

NeuroD1 induces microglial apoptosis and cannot induce microglia-to-neuron cross-lineage reprogramming

期刊

NEURON
卷 109, 期 24, 页码 4094-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.11.008

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC0111202]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31922027, 32000678, 32170958, 32000727]
  3. Program of ShanghaiAcademic/Technology Research Leader [21XD1420400]
  4. Shanghai Pilot Program for Basic Research [21TQ014]
  5. Innovative Research Team of High-Level Local University in Shanghai
  6. Shenzhen Science and Technology Research Program [JCYJ20180507182033219]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that NeuroD1 cannot convert microglia to neurons, instead inducing microglial cell death, hence unable to achieve cross-lineage reprogramming. Lineage tracing revealed virus leakage, confounding the results of glia-to-neuron conversion.
The regenerative capacity of neurons is limited in the central nervous system (CNS), with irreversible neuronal loss upon insult. In contrast, microglia exhibit extraordinary capacity for repopulation. Matsuda et al. (2019) recently reported NeuroD1-induced microglia-to-neuron conversion, aiming to provide an unlimitedsource to regenerate neurons. However, the extent to which NeuroD1 can exert cross-lineage reprogramming of microglia (myeloid lineage) to neurons (neuroectodermal lineage) is unclear. In this study, we unexpectedly found that NeuroD1 cannot convert microglia to neurons in mice. Instead, NeuroD1 expression induces microglial cell death. Moreover, lineage tracing reveals non-specific leakage of similar lentiviruses as previously used for microglia-to-neuron conversion, which confounds the microglia-to-neuron observation. In summary, we demonstrated that NeuroD1 cannot induce microglia-to-neuron cross-lineage reprogramming. We here propose rigid principles for verifying glia-to-neuron conversion. This Matters Arising paper is in response to Matsuda et al. (2019), published in Neuron.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据