4.3 Review

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Nerve Regeneration: A Systematic Review of In Vivo Animal Model Studies

期刊

NEUROMODULATION
卷 25, 期 8, 页码 1248-1258

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2021.12.009

关键词

Electrical stimulation; nerve regeneration; physical therapy; rehabilitation; TENS

资金

  1. Research Project Direccion de Investigacion, Universidad de La Frontera (DIUFRO) [19-0065]
  2. Research Project Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Cientifico y Tecnologico (FONDECYT), Agencia Nacional de Investigacion y Desarrollo de Chile (ANID) [11190300]
  3. DIUFRO

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a noninvasive electrical stimulation therapy that can accelerate nerve regeneration and increase axon quantity and diameter. Low-frequency TENS application can promote normal myelination, while high-frequency TENS application can stimulate motor regeneration but may increase the risk of neuropathic pain. Although further research is needed, TENS seems to be a promising treatment for nerve injury.
Objective: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a noninvasive electrical stimulation therapy indicated for pain control that has been applied for the regeneration of nerves. This systematic review aimed to analyze the evidence on TENS effectiveness on nerve regeneration. Materials and Methods: A systematic review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria: PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and SciELO data bases. Primary research that evaluated TENS on nerve regeneration was considered. Results: Several studies have investigated the use of TENS for pain treatment. A total of six animal studies analyzed TENS for nerve regeneration. The selected articles showed high quality (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments guidelines), with many unclear points related to bias opportunities (Systematic Review Center for Laboratory Animal Experimentation Risk of Bias tool). In general, TENS accelerated functional and motor recovery and increased axon quantity and diameter. More specifically, the application of low-frequency TENS resulted in a continuous basal lamina; a higher density of fibers with normal diameters, indicating normal myelination, showed signs of deterioration and delayed nerve regeneration. In contrast, the high-frequency TENS application stimulated motor regeneration and increased the diameter of the regenerated axons but revealed a small number of axons, demyelination, dark axoplasm, and an increase in the predisposition of neuropathic pain. Conclusions: Although there is some heterogeneous evidence in animal research, TENS seems to be a promising treatment for nerve injury that should be better explored. It is still necessary to improve the analysis of its application parameters, which can lead to the most satisfactory regeneration results and improve the understanding of its mechanisms on peripheral nerve

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据