4.7 Article

Tractography dissection variability: What happens when 42 groups dissect 14 white matter bundles on the same dataset?

期刊

NEUROIMAGE
卷 243, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118502

关键词

Tractography; Bundle segmentation; White matter; Fiber pathways; Dissection

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01EB017230, T32EB001628]
  2. ViSE/VICTR [VR3029]
  3. National Center for Research Resources [UL1 RR024975-01]
  4. Institutional Research Chair in NeuroInformatics of Universitede Sherbrooke
  5. NSERC
  6. Compute Canada
  7. European Union
  8. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [IDDRC U54 HD090256]
  9. NSF [OAC-1916518, IIS-1912270, IIS-1636893, BCS-1734853]
  10. NIH NIBIB [1R01EB029272-01]
  11. Microsoft Faculty Fellowship
  12. Cluster of Excellence Matters of Activity
  13. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy - EXC 2025
  14. Medical Research Council PhD Studentship UK [MR/N013913/1]
  15. FCT - Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia within CINTESIS, RD Unit [UID/IC/4255/2013]
  16. Wellcome Trust [213722/Z/18/Z]
  17. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) [PZ00P2 185814/1]
  18. Sir Henry Wellcome Fellowship [215944/Z/19/Z]
  19. Dutch Research Council (NWO) [17331]
  20. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [APP1091593, APP1117724]
  21. Australian Research Council [DP170101815]
  22. NIH NIMH [T32MH103213]
  23. NIH [P41 EB027061, P30 NS076408, P41EB015902, R01MH119222]
  24. Royal Children's Hospital Foundation [RCH 1000]
  25. Royal Children's Hospital Foundation
  26. Murdoch Children's Research Institute
  27. University of Melbourne Department of Paediatrics
  28. Victorian Government's Operational Infrastructure Support Program
  29. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [MOST 109-2222E-182-001-MY3]
  30. CONACYT
  31. UNAM
  32. European Union [785907, 945539]
  33. ANR [IFOPASUBA- 19-CE45-0022-01]
  34. ANID-Basal [FB0008]
  35. ANIDFONDECYT [1190701]
  36. [P41EB015898]
  37. [K24MH116366]
  38. [R01MH111917]
  39. Wellcome Trust [213722/Z/18/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

White matter bundle segmentation using diffusion MRI fiber tractography is a popular method for identifying white matter fiber pathways in human brains, but there is significant variability in segmentation protocols and techniques. A study evaluated the variability among protocols for bundle segmentation and found that even with the same underlying data, the variability across protocols was greater than other sources of variability, indicating a need to reduce heterogeneity for reproducible research and routine clinical use of tractography bundle dissection.
White matter bundle segmentation using diffusion MRI fiber tractography has become the method of choice to identify white matter fiber pathways in vivo in human brains. However, like other analyses of complex data, there is considerable variability in segmentation protocols and techniques. This can result in different reconstructions of the same intended white matter pathways, which directly affects tractography results, quantification, and interpretation. In this study, we aim to evaluate and quantify the variability that arises from different protocols for bundle segmentation. Through an open call to users of fiber tractography, including anatomists, clinicians, and algorithm developers, 42 independent teams were given processed sets of human whole-brain streamlines and asked to segment 14 white matter fascicles on six subjects. In total, we received 57 different bundle segmentation protocols, which enabled detailed volume-based and streamline-based analyses of agreement and disagreement among protocols for each fiber pathway. Results show that even when given the exact same sets of underlying streamlines, the variability across protocols for bundle segmentation is greater than all other sources of variability in the virtual dissection process, including variability within protocols and variability across subjects. In order to foster the use of tractography bundle dissection in routine clinical settings, and as a fundamental analytical tool, future endeavors must aim to resolve and reduce this heterogeneity. Although external validation is needed to verify the anatomical accuracy of bundle dissections, reducing heterogeneity is a step towards reproducible research and may be achieved through the use of standard nomenclature and definitions of white matter bundles and well-chosen constraints and decisions in the dissection process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据