4.6 Article

Cost-effective Batch-mode Multi-label Active Learning

期刊

NEUROCOMPUTING
卷 463, 期 -, 页码 355-367

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2021.08.063

关键词

Multi-label learning; Batch-mode active learning; Information and redundancy; Label correlations; Label sparsity

资金

  1. Qilu Scholar Fund of Shandong University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Active learning aims to select valuable unlabeled instances to improve learner performance. Batch-mode active learning methods are more efficient than myopic methods and can reduce query and time costs.
Active learning aims to select the most valuable unlabeled instances for annotations and thus to maximize the performance of a learner with the selected instances. Batch-mode active learning methods can select a batch of unlabeled instances with informativeness and low redundancy at each iteration, they are more efficient than myopic active learning methods, which typically have to retrain the model after querying each instance. However, Batch-mode Multi-label Active Learning is not well explored yet, since it is quite difficult to select a batch of instances or instance-label pairs with high informativeness but low redundancy for query and budget saving. In this paper, we propose a novel approach CBMAL (Costeffective Batch-mode Multi-label Active Learning) to address this challenge. CBMAL firstly selects a batch of informative instance-label pairs using uncertainty, label correlation and label space sparsity. Next, CBMAL leverages the information from the feature and label dimensions to pick out a small batch of instance-label pairs with the highest information and lowest redundancy from the first batch. These instance-label pairs are then queried and used to update the learner for the next iteration. Experimental results on six benchmark datasets demonstrate that CBMAL can reduce both the query and time costs while achieve a better performance than state-of-the-art methods. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据