4.6 Review

Object recognition datasets and challenges: A review

期刊

NEUROCOMPUTING
卷 495, 期 -, 页码 129-152

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2022.01.022

关键词

Computer vision; Object recognition; Deep learning

资金

  1. Aria Salari [IT16412]
  2. Vancouver Computer Vision

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article provides a detailed analysis of datasets in the highly investigated field of object recognition, summarizing statistical data and descriptions of over 160 datasets. It also introduces object recognition benchmarks and competitions, along with commonly adopted evaluation metrics in the computer vision community.
Object recognition is among the fundamental tasks in the computer vision applications, paving the path for all other image understanding operations. In every stage of progress in object recognition research, efforts have been made to collect and annotate new datasets to match the capacity of the state-of-theart algorithms. In recent years, the importance of the size and quality of datasets has been intensified as the utility of the emerging deep network techniques heavily relies on training data. Furthermore, data sets lay a fair benchmarking means for competitions and have proved instrumental to the advancements of object recognition research by providing quantifiable benchmarks for the developed models. Taking a closer look at the characteristics of commonly-used public datasets seems to be an important first step for data-driven and machine learning researchers. In this survey, we provide a detailed analysis of datasets in the highly investigated object recognition areas. More than 160 datasets have been scrutinized through statistics and descriptions. Additionally, we present an overview of the prominent object recognition benchmarks and competitions, along with a description of the metrics widely adopted for evaluation purposes in the computer vision community. All introduced datasets and challenges can be found online at github.com/AbtinDjavadifar/ORDC.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据