4.5 Review

Emerging roles of oxidative stress in brain aging and Alzheimer's disease

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 107, 期 -, 页码 86-95

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2021.07.014

关键词

Oxidative stress; Alzheimer's disease; Brain aging; Exercise; Cognition

资金

  1. NIH [NIA AG057558, AG051807, T32 AG000096]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are metabolic byproducts that can be toxic at high levels and have been linked to cognitive aging and neurodegenerative diseases. Therapeutics like antioxidants, caloric restriction, and physical activity can reduce oxidation and prevent cognitive decline in brain aging and AD. Long term physical activity shows promise in improving cognitive health by reducing ROS levels and promoting optimal function.
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are metabolic byproducts that are necessary for physiological function but can be toxic at high levels. Levels of these oxidative stressors increase gradually throughout the lifespan, impairing mitochondrial function and damaging all parts of the body, particularly the central nervous system. Emerging evidence suggests that accumulated oxidative stress may be one of the key mechanisms causing cognitive aging and neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD). Here, we synthesize the current literature on the effect of neuronal oxidative stress on mitochondrial dysfunction, DNA damage and epigenetic changes related to cognitive aging and AD. We further describe how oxidative stress therapeutics such as antioxidants, caloric restriction and physical activity can reduce oxidation and prevent cognitive decline in brain aging and AD. Of the currently available therapeutics, we propose that long term physical activity is the most promising avenue for improving cognitive health by reducing ROS while promoting the low levels required for optimal function. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据