4.5 Article

APOE, TOMM40, and sex interactions on neural network connectivity

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 109, 期 -, 页码 158-165

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2021.09.020

关键词

TOMM40; Resting state Fmri; APOE; Default mode network; Aging

资金

  1. Iowa State University
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R00 AG047282]
  3. Alzheimer's Association Research Grant to Promote Diversity (AARG-D) [17-529552]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

APOE ε4 carriers showed weaker connectivity in multiple networks, while '650 G carriers had higher connectivity in the language comprehension network. In APOE ε4 carriers, '650 G carriers exhibited decreased network strength with age, which was observed in women but not men among non-G carriers. TOMM40 may modulate network activity in aging APOE ε4 carriers depending on sex.
The Apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 (APOE epsilon 4) haplotype is the strongest genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD). The Translocase of Outer Mitochondrial Membrane-40 (TOMM40) gene maintains cellular bioenergetics, which is disrupted in AD. TOMM40 rs2075650 ('650) G versus A carriage is consistently related to neural and cognitive outcomes, but it is unclear if and how it interacts with APOE. We examined 21 orthogonal neural networks among 8,222 middle-aged to aged participants in the UK Biobank cohort. ANOVA and multiple linear regression tested main effects and interactions with APOE and TOMM40 '650 genotypes, and if age and sex acted as moderators. APOE epsilon 4 was associated with less strength in multiple networks, while '650 G versus A carriage was related to more language comprehension network strength. In APOE epsilon 4 carriers, '650 G-carriage led to less network strength with increasing age, while in non-G-carriers this was only seen in women but not men. TOMM40 may shift what happens to network activity in aging APOE epsilon 4 carriers depending on sex. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据