3.8 Article

Post-concussion Syndrome Light Sensitivity: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

期刊

NEURO-OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 46, 期 2, 页码 85-90

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/01658107.2021.1983612

关键词

Concussion; postconcussion syndrome; photophobia; melanopsin; topical anaesthetic; tinted glasses

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Photophobia is considered a common symptom in both concussion and post-concussion syndrome, especially among soldiers. Patients may experience other symptoms in addition to photophobia, and the sensitivity to light can last for months or indefinitely, highlighting the need for more attention and research in this area.
Photophobia is considered the second most common symptom of both concussion and post-concussion syndrome. Soldiers on duty experience photophobia after blast-related concussions or mild traumatic brain injury in 60-75% of instances. In addition, soldiers report other symptoms, such as asthenopia, squinting, dry eyes and headaches, for which they are considered to be at high risk. According to the International Brain Injury Association, some concussed patients report indirect symptoms such as multi-tasking difficulties, dizziness, vertigo, and fatigue. Moreover, some concussed individuals experience photophobia for approximately 6 months or indefinitely. We present the case of a 23-year-old soldier who presented with severe photophobia after a mild traumatic head injury. His photophobia was alleviated after the administration of topical anaesthetic drops in the eyes in the absence of any ocular surface pathology. He was diagnosed with post-concussion syndrome light sensitivity and was managed successfully with rose-coloured special photophobia glasses tinted with FL-41. Photophobia is a common neurological symptom in military personnel that needs more attention as it affects body and mind. We have reported an uncommon pathway of photophobia, which may unveil an unrecognised mechanism that may play a role in post-concussion photophobia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据