4.6 Article

Deep localization of subcellular protein structures from fluorescence microscopy images

期刊

NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS
卷 34, 期 7, 页码 5701-5714

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-021-06715-y

关键词

Convolutional neural network (CNN); Fluorescence microscopy; Protein images; Subcellular localization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the effectiveness of deep learning-based pipelines for protein image classification. The proposed end-to-end Protein Localization Convolutional Neural Network (PLCNN) can accurately and reliably classify protein images.
Accurate localization of proteins from fluorescence microscopy images is challenging due to the inter-class similarities and intra-class disparities introducing grave concerns in addressing multi-class classification problems. Conventional machine learning-based image prediction pipelines rely heavily on pre-processing such as normalization and segmentation followed by handcrafted feature extraction to identify useful, informative, and application-specific features. Here, we demonstrate that deep learning-based pipelines can effectively classify protein images from different datasets. We propose an end-to-end Protein Localization Convolutional Neural Network (PLCNN) that classifies protein images more accurately and reliably. PLCNN processes raw imagery without involving any pre-processing steps and produces outputs without any customization or parameter adjustment for a particular dataset. Experimental analysis is performed on five benchmark datasets. PLCNN consistently outperformed the existing state-of-the-art approaches from traditional machine learning and deep architectures. This study highlights the importance of deep learning for the analysis of fluorescence microscopy protein imagery. The proposed deep pipeline can better guide drug designing procedures in the pharmaceutical industry and open new avenues for researchers in computational biology and bioinformatics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据