4.7 Review

Disentangling host-microbiota complexity through hologenomics

期刊

NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS
卷 23, 期 5, 页码 281-297

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41576-021-00421-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Danish National Research Foundation [DNRF143]
  2. Lundbeckfonden grant [R250-2017-1351]
  3. European Union [HoloFood-817729]
  4. FHF (Norwegian Seafood Research Fund) [901436]
  5. Lundbeckfonden Fellowship [R335-2019-1513]
  6. Independent Research Council Denmark Sapere Aude grant [9064-00029B]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hologenomic studies integrate host genomes and microbiota metagenomes to explore host-microbiota interactions, which have become a central topic in the biological sciences. Hologenomics offers a feasible approach to overcoming limitations in the study of animal-microbiota interactions and addresses important questions in biology.
Hologenomic studies aim to further our understanding of host-microbiota interactions through the integrated analysis of host genomes and microbiota metagenomes. Here, Alberdi and colleagues discuss key considerations for designing optimal hologenomic studies and outline important biological questions that these studies can address. Research on animal-microbiota interactions has become a central topic in biological sciences because of its relevance to basic eco-evolutionary processes and applied questions in agriculture and health. However, animal hosts and their associated microbial communities are still seldom studied in a systemic fashion. Hologenomics, the integrated study of the genetic features of a eukaryotic host alongside that of its associated microbes, is becoming a feasible - yet still underexploited - approach that overcomes this limitation. Acknowledging the biological and genetic properties of both hosts and microbes, along with the advantages and disadvantages of implemented techniques, is essential for designing optimal studies that enable some of the major questions in biology to be addressed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据