4.8 Article

Deep learning and alignment of spatially resolved single-cell transcriptomes with Tangram

期刊

NATURE METHODS
卷 18, 期 11, 页码 1352-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41592-021-01264-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. BICCN [U19 MH114821, U19 MH114830]
  2. Human Biomolecular Atlas Project [NIH 1OT2OD026673-01]
  3. Klarman Cell Observatory
  4. HHMI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tangram is a versatile tool that aligns single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-seq data to spatially resolved transcriptomics data using deep learning. By addressing the loss of spatial information in single-cell data and overcoming technical limitations, this method demonstrates genome-wide anatomically integrated spatial mapping at single-cell resolution on healthy mouse brain tissue.
Tangram is a versatile tool for aligning single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-seq data to spatially resolved transcriptomics data using deep learning. Charting an organs' biological atlas requires us to spatially resolve the entire single-cell transcriptome, and to relate such cellular features to the anatomical scale. Single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-seq (sc/snRNA-seq) can profile cells comprehensively, but lose spatial information. Spatial transcriptomics allows for spatial measurements, but at lower resolution and with limited sensitivity. Targeted in situ technologies solve both issues, but are limited in gene throughput. To overcome these limitations we present Tangram, a method that aligns sc/snRNA-seq data to various forms of spatial data collected from the same region, including MERFISH, STARmap, smFISH, Spatial Transcriptomics (Visium) and histological images. Tangram can map any type of sc/snRNA-seq data, including multimodal data such as those from SHARE-seq, which we used to reveal spatial patterns of chromatin accessibility. We demonstrate Tangram on healthy mouse brain tissue, by reconstructing a genome-wide anatomically integrated spatial map at single-cell resolution of the visual and somatomotor areas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据