4.8 Article

Rear traction forces drive adherent tissue migration in vivo

期刊

NATURE CELL BIOLOGY
卷 24, 期 2, 页码 194-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41556-022-00844-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. NYULH DART Microscopy Laboratory [P30CA016087]
  2. Memorial Sloan Kettering Molecular Cytology Core Facility [P30 CA008748]
  3. NIH [NS102322]
  4. NYSTEM fellowship [C322560GG]
  5. American Heart Association [20PRE35180164]
  6. NSF CAREER award [1652515]
  7. NSF [IIS-1320635, OAC-1835712, OIA-1937043, CHS-1908767, CHS-1901091]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports a new approach to measure cell migration stresses in zebrafish embryos and suggests that collectively migrating cells may be pushed forward by their rear cells. The findings have important implications for understanding animal embryonic development and tissue motion.
Yamaguchi et al. report an approach to measure stresses during cell migration in the zebrafish embryo in vivo, and suggest that collectively migrating cells may be pushed forward by their rear cells. During animal embryogenesis, homeostasis and disease, tissues push and pull on their surroundings to move forward. Although the force-generating machinery is known, it is unknown how tissues exert physical stresses on their substrate to generate motion in vivo. Here, we identify the force transmission machinery, the substrate and the stresses that a tissue, the zebrafish posterior lateral line primordium, generates during its migration. We find that the primordium couples actin flow through integrins to the basement membrane for forward movement. Talin- and integrin-mediated coupling is required for efficient migration, and its loss is partially compensated for by increased actin flow. Using Embryogram, an approach to measure stresses in vivo, we show that the rear of the primordium exerts higher stresses than the front, which suggests that this tissue pushes itself forward with its back. This unexpected strategy probably also underlies the motion of other tissues in animals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据