4.8 Article

POLθ-mediated end joining is restricted by RAD52 and BRCA2 until the onset of mitosis

期刊

NATURE CELL BIOLOGY
卷 23, 期 10, 页码 1095-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41556-021-00764-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [393547839-SFB 1361]
  2. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung [02NUK054C, 02NUK050B, 02NUK042D]
  3. National Institutes of Health [CA187561, P30 CA93373, GM58015, GM137751, CA247773, CA193124]
  4. J. Ralph Meadows Chair in Carcinogenesis Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BRCA2-deficient cells are vulnerable to inactivation of DNA repair pathways for DSBs, which can be exploited clinically. RAD52 and BRCA2 regulate the TMEJ process by blocking the POL theta function, ensuring proper repair of DSBs in mitosis.
BRCA2-mutant cells are defective in homologous recombination, making them vulnerable to the inactivation of other pathways for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). This concept can be clinically exploited but is currently limited due to insufficient knowledge about how DSBs are repaired in the absence of BRCA2. We show that DNA polymerase theta (POL theta)-mediated end joining (TMEJ) repairs DSBs arising during the S phase in BRCA2-deficient cells only after the onset of the ensuing mitosis. This process is regulated by RAD52, whose loss causes the premature usage of TMEJ and the formation of chromosomal fusions. Purified RAD52 and BRCA2 proteins both block the DNA polymerase function of POL theta, suggesting a mechanism explaining their synthetic lethal relationships. We propose that the delay of TMEJ until mitosis ensures the conversion of originally one-ended DSBs into two-ended DSBs. Mitotic chromatin condensation might further serve to juxtapose correct break ends and limit chromosomal fusions. Lobrich and colleagues report that RAD52 and BRCA2 limit polymerase theta activity until the onset of mitosis to ensure double-strand breaks arising in the S phase are repaired by polymerase theta-mediated end joining in mitosis, not in S phase.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据