4.8 Article

Multiscale and integrative single-cell Hi-C analysis with Higashi

期刊

NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 40, 期 2, 页码 254-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41587-021-01034-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health Common Fund 4D Nucleome Program [U54DK107965, UM1HG011593]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01HG007352]
  3. Guggenheim Fellowship from the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Higashi is an algorithm based on hypergraph representation learning that outperforms existing methods for embedding and imputation of scHi-C data, and can identify multiscale 3D genome features in single cells. Furthermore, Higashi can incorporate epigenomic signals jointly profiled in the same cell, leading to improved embeddings for single-nucleus methyl-3C data.
Single-cell Hi-C (scHi-C) can identify cell-to-cell variability of three-dimensional (3D) chromatin organization, but the sparseness of measured interactions poses an analysis challenge. Here we report Higashi, an algorithm based on hypergraph representation learning that can incorporate the latent correlations among single cells to enhance overall imputation of contact maps. Higashi outperforms existing methods for embedding and imputation of scHi-C data and is able to identify multiscale 3D genome features in single cells, such as compartmentalization and TAD-like domain boundaries, allowing refined delineation of their cell-to-cell variability. Moreover, Higashi can incorporate epigenomic signals jointly profiled in the same cell into the hypergraph representation learning framework, as compared to separate analysis of two modalities, leading to improved embeddings for single-nucleus methyl-3C data. In an scHi-C dataset from human prefrontal cortex, Higashi identifies connections between 3D genome features and cell-type-specific gene regulation. Higashi can also potentially be extended to analyze single-cell multiway chromatin interactions and other multimodal single-cell omics data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据