4.3 Article

Integrative Analysis to Uncover the Molecular Mechanisms of Caesalpinia sappan L. for Anti-Cancer Activity

期刊

NATURAL PRODUCT COMMUNICATIONS
卷 16, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1934578X211039922

关键词

Caesalpinia sappan; network pharmacology; CCLE; molecular docking; anticancer natural product

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sappan extract can induce apoptosis of HepG2 cells in a dose-dependent manner and down regulate the phosphorylation level of Akt protein thr308 in a dose-dependent manner. This study provides new ideas for Sappan's anticancer research through the strategy of system pharmacology.
Objectives: Caesalpinia Sappan L. is a traditional Chinese medicine with a long history. Recent studies have confirmed that Sappan has an antitumor effect, but its specific mechanism is still unclear. Methods: In this study, we used network pharmacology to predict the target and signal pathway of Sappan. In addition, the Cancer Genome Atlas and cancer cell lines encyclopedia large-scale genomic databases were used to analyze the relationship between different subtypes of Akt. Based on molecular docking technology, the interaction mode between small molecule compounds and protein targets was explored. Finally, we studied the effect of Sappan on Akt protein expression by Western blot in vitro. Results: AKT1 and AKT2 were significantly expressed in breast cancer cells, but they were significantly different from AKT3. Finally, molecular docking analysis showed that (3R,5R)-1,3,4,5-tetrakis(((E)-3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)acryloyl)oxy)cyclohexane-1-carboxylic acid had a very ideal binding mode with Akt. Subsequent experiments showed that Sappan extract could induce apoptosis of HepG2 cells in a dose-dependent manner, and down regulate the phosphorylation level of Akt protein thr308 in a dose-dependent manner. Conclusions: This study provides new ideas for Sappan's anticancer research through the strategy of system pharmacology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据