4.6 Article

A new method for high resolution curvature measurement applied to stress monitoring in thin films

期刊

NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 33, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/ac4a2a

关键词

wafer curvature; stress-thickness; growth; digital image correlation; thin film

资金

  1. French National Research Agency(project FRAXOS) [ANR-15-CHIN-0003]
  2. ANRT (Agence Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie)
  3. Saint-Gobain Recherche Paris

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a new method, PReMC, which combines the grid reflection method, digital image correlation algorithm, and geometrical optics model to accurately measure the curvature change of a smooth reflecting substrate and analyze the residual stress during deposition processes. The method achieves high resolution and dynamic range and is capable of mapping local variations in non-uniform curvature.
By combining the well-known grid reflection method with a digital image correlation algorithm and a geometrical optics model, a new method is proposed for measuring the change of curvature of a smooth reflecting substrate, a common reporter of stress state of deposited layers. This tool, called Pattern Reflection for Mapping of Curvature (PReMC), can be easily implemented for the analysis of the residual stress during deposition processes and is sufficiently accurate to follow the compressive-tensile-compressive stress transition during the sputtering growth of a Ag film on a Si substrate. Unprecedented resolution below 10(-5) m(-1) can be reached when measuring a homogeneous curvature. A comparison with the conventional laser-based tool is also provided in terms of dynamical range and resolution. In addition, the method is capable of mapping local variations in the case of a non-uniform curvature as illustrated by the case of a Mo film of non-uniform film thickness under high compressive stress. PReMC offers interesting perspectives for in situ accurate stress monitoring in the field of thin film growth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据