4.8 Article

Sulfur-deficient Bi2S3-x synergistically coupling Ti3C2Tx-MXene for boosting electrocatalytic N2 reduction

期刊

NANO RESEARCH
卷 15, 期 5, 页码 3991-3999

出版社

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-022-4097-9

关键词

electrocatalytic nitrogen reduction; bismuth catalyst; MXene; vacancy engineering; interface engineering

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51761024, 52161025]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province [20JR10RA241]
  3. Longyuan Youth Innovative and Entrepreneurial Talents Project [[2021]17]
  4. Longyuan Young Talents Program of Gansu Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, an efficient NRR catalyst was designed using defect and interface engineering. The catalyst exhibited enhanced NRR activity, surpassing other reported catalysts. Theoretical investigations revealed the synergistic effect of the catalyst's dual-active-center system in the NRR process.
Electrocatalytic nitrogen reduction reaction (NRR) is an appealing route for the sustainable NH3 synthesis, while developing efficient and durable NRR catalysts remains at the heart of achieving high-efficiency N-2-to-NH3 electrocatalysis. Herein, we rationally combine vacancy and interface engineering to design sulfur-deficient Bi2S3 nanoparticles decorated Ti3C2Tx-MXene as an effective NRR catalyst. The developed Bi2S3 nanoparticles decorated Ti3C2Tx-MXene (Bi2S3-x/Ti3C2Tx) naturally contained abundant S-vacancies and exhibited a dramatically boosted NRR activity with an NH3 yield of 68.3 mu g.h(-1)mg(-1) (-0.6 V) and a Faradaic efficiency of 22.5% (-0.4 V), far superior to pure Bi2S3 and Ti3C2Tx, and surpassing almost all ever reported Bi- and MXene-based NRR catalysts. Theoretical investigations unveiled that the exceptional NRR activity of Bi2S3-x/Ti3C2Tx stemmed from its dual-active-center system involving both S-vacancies and interfacial-Bi sites, which could synergistically promote N-2 adsorption and *N2H formation to result in an energetic-favorable NRR process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据