4.8 Article

From Low-Field Sondheimer Oscillations to High-Field Very Large and Linear Magnetoresistance in a SrTiO3-Based Two-Dimensional Electron Gas

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 65-72

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c03198

关键词

2D electron gas; linear magnetoresistance; Sondheimer oscillations; oxide interfaces

资金

  1. ERC Advanced FRESCO Grant [833973]
  2. H2020-EU ESTEEM3 Grant [823717]
  3. ANR QUANTOP grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study has found a large linear magnetoresistance in a SrTiO3 two-dimensional electron gas, which is caused by nanoscale inhomogeneities and revealed by interference between helicoidal electron trajectories, determining the thickness of 2DEG. These results deepen our understanding of the origin of linear magnetoresistance in quantum materials and open up exciting possibilities for exploring the interaction of linear MR with features like Rashba spin-orbit coupling.
Quantum materials harbor a cornucopia of exotic transport phenomena challenging our understanding of condensed matter. Among these, a giant, nonsaturating linear magnetoresistance (MR) has been reported in various systems, from Weyl semimetals to topological insulators. Its origin is often ascribed to unusual band structure effects, but it may also be caused by extrinsic sample disorder. Here, we report a very large linear MR in a SrTiO3 two-dimensional electron gas and, by combining transport measurements with electron spectromicroscopy, show that it is caused by nanoscale inhomogeneities that are self-organized during sample growth. Our data also reveal semiclassical Sondheimer oscillations arising from interferences between helicoidal electron trajectories, from which we determine the 2DEG thickness. Our results bring insight into the origin of linear MR in quantum materials, expand the range of functionalities of oxide 2DEGs, and suggest exciting routes to explore the interaction of linear MR with features like Rashba spin-orbit coupling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据