4.8 Article

A Redox-Activatable DNA Nanodevice for Spatially-Selective, AND-Gated Imaging of ATP and Glutathione in Mitochondria

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 21, 期 23, 页码 10047-10053

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c03732

关键词

DNA nanodevices; molecular imaging; mitochondria; ATP; GSH

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22125402]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [JQ20005]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences [YJKYYQ20180055, ZDBS-LY-SLH025]
  4. K. C. Wong Education Foundation [GJTD-2018-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports a new strategy for imaging ATP and GSH in mitochondria, utilizing nanoparticle targeting capability and redox-activatable aptamer sensor design. The system allows for correlated imaging of ATP and GSH in mitochondria, as well as specific imaging of tumors in vivo. This work highlights the potential of DNA nanodevices in imaging mitochondrial multivariate targets.
Design of biosensors capable of imaging ATP and glutathione (GSH) in mitochondria remains a challenge, despite their importance in elucidating their correlated pathophysiological events. Here, we report a new strategy that uses redox-activatable aptamer sensor design combined with nanoparticle-based targeting capability to achieve spatially controlled, AND-gated imaging of ATP and GSH in mitochondria. The DNA nanodevice was designed by the controlled assembly of the redox-responsive ATP aptamer probe on the nanoparticles and further decorated with mitochondria-targeting signals. We demonstrate that the system allows for mitochondria-specific, correlated imaging of ATP and GSH in living cells and in vivo. Furthermore, because the system can be lighted up only when meeting the dual keys (overexpressed ATP and GSH in mitochondria) simultaneously, the DNA nanodevice enables specific imaging of tumors in vivo with improved tumor-to-normal tissue ratio. This work illustrates the potential of the DNA nanodevices in the imaging of mitochondrial multivariate targets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据