4.6 Article

Adaptive multi-task learning using lagrange multiplier for automatic art analysis

期刊

MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS
卷 81, 期 3, 页码 3715-3733

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-021-11360-7

关键词

Automatic art analysis; Multi-task learning; lagrange multiplier strategy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1909202]
  2. Key Laboratory of Brain Machine Collaborative Intelligence of Zhejiang Province [2020E10010]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Provincial Universities of Zhejiang, China [GK209907299001-008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, an adaptive multi-task learning method based on lagrange multiplier strategy was proposed to weight multiple loss functions and improve performance. Experimental results demonstrated that the method outperformed state-of-the-art techniques in art classification and cross-modal art retrieval.
Numerous computer vision applications, such as image classification, have benefited from multi-task learning techniques. However, the relative weighting between each task's loss is hard to be tuned by hand, causing multi-task learning prohibitive in real applications. In this paper, we present a novel and principled adaptive multi-task learning method that weights multiple loss functions based on lagrange multiplier strategy. Our method starts from the standard multi-task learning model. Based on Gaussian likelihood and lagrange multiplier, we then design an adaptive multi-task learning model to learn suitable weightings of each task and boost performance. In order to validate the feasibility of proposed method, we conduct automatic art analysis tests, including art classification and cross-modal art retrieval. Experimental results demonstrate that our method outperforms several state-of-the-art techniques, showing that performance is improved by up to 4.2% in art classification and 8.7% in cross-modal art retrieval when compared with the latest automatic loss weights learning method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据