4.6 Article

Split-attention effects in multimedia learning environments: eye-tracking and EEG analysis

期刊

MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS
卷 81, 期 6, 页码 8259-8282

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-022-12296-2

关键词

Multimedia learning; Electroencephalography; Eye movements; Attention; Retention

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the split-attention group had inferior learning performance in terms of fixation, brain wave, and memory compared to the focused attention group. More cognitive activity emerged in environments where the text was not integrated into the picture. Narration of text, instead of printed text, was more effective in focusing attention.
This study aimed to evaluate the split-attention effect in multimedia learning environments via objective measurements as EEG and eye-tracking. Two different multimedia learning environments in a focused (integrated) and split-attention (separated) format were designed. The experimental design method was used. The participants consisted of 44 students divided into two groups for focused attention and split-attention. There were significant differences between the fixation, brain wave, and retention performance of the two groups. Fixations of the split-attention group were higher than the focused attention group. A significant difference was found in the focused attention group in the alpha brain wave in the frontal region for intra-group comparisons and in the split-attention group in the beta brain wave in the frontal area for the inter-group comparison. The retention performance of the focused attention group was higher than the split-attention group. Accordingly, more cognitive activity emerged in environments where the text was not integrated into the picture. Additionally, the narration of text instead of printed text is effective for focusing attention. To prevent the emergence of a split-attention effect, the text should be integrated into the picture in designs. Due to the split-attention effect, the eye-tracking and EEG data were different between the groups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据