4.6 Article

Classifying Idiopathic Rapid Eye Movement Sleep Behavior Disorder, Controls, and Mild Parkinson's Disease Using Gait Parameters

期刊

MOVEMENT DISORDERS
卷 37, 期 4, 页码 842-846

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mds.28894

关键词

idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder; iRBD; gait parameters; Parkinson's disease; machine learning classification; conversion

资金

  1. GCS MERRI MONTPELLIER-NIMES

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study successfully developed a multiclass model using statistical learning to distinguish patients with idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (iRBD), healthy control subjects (HCs), and patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). The results demonstrated that gait parameters and a pretrained statistical model can robustly differentiate participants with iRBD from HCs and patients with PD.
Background Subtle gait changes associated with idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) could allow early detection of subjects with future synucleinopathies. Objective The aim of this study was to create a multiclass model, using statistical learning from probability distribution of gait parameters, to distinguish between patients with iRBD, healthy control subjects (HCs), and patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Methods Gait parameters were collected in 21 participants with iRBD, 21 with PD, and 21 HCs, matched for age, sex, and education level. Lasso sparse linear regression explored gait features able to classify the three groups. Results The final model classified iRBD from HCs and from patients with PD equally well, with 95% accuracy, 100% sensitivity, and 90% specificity. Conclusions Gait parameters and a pretrained statistical model can robustly distinguish participants with iRBD from HCs and patients with PD. This could be used to screen subjects with future synucleinopathies in the general population and to identify a conversion threshold to PD. (c) 2022 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据