4.7 Article

PLATO hare-and-hounds exercise: asteroseismic model fitting of main-sequence solar-like pulsators

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab2886

关键词

asteroseismology; methods: statistical; stars: evolution; stars: fundamental parameters; stars: oscillations

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) [UIDB/04434/2020, UIDP/04434/2020, PTDC/FISAST/30389/2017]
  2. Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional (FEDER) through COMPETE2020 -Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalizacao [POCI-01-0145FEDER-030389]
  3. FCT [CEECIND/02619/2017, CEECIND/00476/2018]
  4. Carlsberg Foundation [CF19-0649]
  5. Danish National Research Foundation [DNRF106]
  6. European Commission
  7. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  8. 'Branco Weiss fellowship -Science in Society' through the SEISMIC stellar interior physics group
  9. French space agency (CNES)
  10. European Research Council [772293]
  11. French National Research Agency (ANR) [BEAMING ANR-18-CE31-0001]
  12. Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Asteroseismology is a powerful tool for inferring fundamental stellar properties, with an experiment revealing the accuracy of inferred values for mass, radius, and age. Different inference procedures, physics assumptions, and weighting of constraints were found to significantly impact the results. Only a few frequencies were needed for accurate mass and radius estimates, while at least one l = 2 mode was crucial for age estimates.
Asteroseismology is a powerful tool to infer fundamental stellar properties. The use of these asteroseismic-inferred properties in a growing number of astrophysical contexts makes it vital to understand their accuracy. Consequently, we performed a hare-and-hounds exercise where the hares simulated data for six artificial main-sequence stars and the hounds inferred their properties based on different inference procedures. To mimic a pipeline such as that planned for the PLATO mission, all hounds used the same model grid. Some stars were simulated using the physics adopted in the grid, others a different one. The maximum relative differences found (in absolute value) between the inferred and true values of the mass, radius, and age were 4.32, 1.33, and 11.25 per cent, respectively. The largest systematic differences in radius and age were found for a star simulated assuming gravitational settling, not accounted for in the model grid, with biases of -0.88 per cent (radius) and 8.66 per cent (age). For the mass, the most significant bias (-3.16 per cent) was found for a star with a helium enrichment ratio outside the grid range. Moreover, an similar to 7 per cent dispersion in age was found when adopting different prescriptions for the surface corrections or shifting the classical observations by +/- 1 sigma. The choice of the relative weight given to the classical and seismic constraints also impacted significantly the accuracy and precision of the results. Interestingly, only a few frequencies were required to achieve accurate results on the mass and radius. For the age the same was true when at least one l = 2 mode was considered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据