4.7 Article

Hyperbolically symmetric static charged cosmological fluid models

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab3546

关键词

black hole physics; gravitation; hydrodynamics; instabilities; methods: analytical

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [18-12-00213-P]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, the study focuses on the fluid distributions affected by electromagnetism, specifically on the hyperbolically symmetric metric. Modified gravitational formulations with charge are used to calculate the effective energy-momentum tensor, which is then refined using tetrad field components in the Minkowski coordinate system. The results show that the hyperbolically symmetrical source has a negative effective matter density in all stellar formulations. This emphasizes the importance of quantum processes and specific constraints in explaining physical phenomena under the influence of electromagnetic fields.
In this work, the study on static fluid distributions under the influence of electromagnetism has been carried out with an emphasis on the hyperbolically symmetric metric. For this purpose, modified gravitational formulations in the presence of charge are used to calculate the effective energy-momentum tensor, which is then further refined by taking into account tetrad field components in the Minkowski coordinate system. Also, we compute the Tolman mass and a suitable formulation of the mass function. It exhibits that the hyperbolically symmetrical source has a negative effective matter density in all stellar formulations. This demonstrates that the quantum processes together with certain excessive constraints are deemed important to explain any physical implementations under the effects of the electromagnetic field. Additionally, we assessed the structure scalars and implemented the orthogonal splitting of the structure scalars and Riemann tensor in this modified gravity. Subsequently, various explicit precise cosmological solutions and their generating functions are developed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据