4.6 Article

Evolution of Physicochemical Parameters during the Thermal-Based Production of agua-mel, a Traditional Portuguese Honey-Related Food Product

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 27, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules27010057

关键词

agua-mel; thermal processing; 5-hydroxymethylfurfural; sugars; color; kinetics

资金

  1. FCT-Foundation for Science and Technology [UIDB/04020/2020]
  2. Proyectos de Cooperacion Transfronteriza en la Eurorregion Alentejo-Algarve-Andalucia (Caracterizacion de mieles y productos derivados (agua-mel) en el suroeste de la peninsula iberica. Estudio de su potencial biologico)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to investigate the physicochemical changes that occur during the thermal-based production of agua-mel. The results showed a gradual decrease in sugar content, accompanied by the formation of brown pigments and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural. The study also found an increased concentration of soluble solids and darker color as the processing progressed.
The purpose of this work was to investigate the physicochemical changes occurring during the thermal-based production of agua-mel, a traditional Portuguese honey-related food product. The refractive index, color parameters (hue angle, H degrees; chroma, C*), and the content of total reducing sugars, glucose, fructose, total brown pigments, and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural were monitored along the entire production process, and their evolution was kinetically modelled. Thermal processing caused a gradual decrease in sugars, which was accompanied by the formation of brown pigments and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, increased concentration of soluble solids as evaluated through refractive index measurements, as well as the appearance of darker colors. In particular, a zero-order kinetic model could explain the changes in H degrees and reducing sugars, while the evolution of refractive index, brown pigments, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, C*, fructose, and glucose were best fitted using a first-order kinetics model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据