4.6 Review

Recent Developments in Nitric Oxide Donors and Delivery for Antimicrobial and Anti-Biofilm Applications

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules27030674

关键词

nitric oxide; nitric oxide donors; antibacterial; biofilm

资金

  1. Singapore Ministry of Education [MOE2019-T2-1-050]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of nitric oxide (NO) shows promise as a novel approach for treating antibiotic resistant bacteria and biofilm infections. Different strategies have been developed to overcome the limitations of NO's reactivity and enable controlled release, including the design of NO-releasing materials and encapsulation of NO donors. This review summarizes recent developments and discusses limitations and variability in biological responses to the use of NO for bacterial eradication.
The use of nitric oxide (NO) is emerging as a promising, novel approach for the treatment of antibiotic resistant bacteria and biofilm infections. Depending on the concentration, NO can induce biofilm dispersal, increase bacteria susceptibility to antibiotic treatment, and induce cell damage or cell death via the formation of reactive oxygen or reactive nitrogen species. The use of NO is, however, limited by its reactivity, which can affect NO delivery to its target site and result in off-target effects. To overcome these issues, and enable spatial or temporal control over NO release, various strategies for the design of NO-releasing materials, including the incorporation of photo-activable, charge-switchable, or bacteria-targeting groups, have been developed. Other strategies have focused on increased NO storage and delivery by encapsulation or conjugation of NO donors within a single polymeric framework. This review compiles recent developments in NO drugs and NO-releasing materials designed for applications in antimicrobial or anti-biofilm treatment and discusses limitations and variability in biological responses in response to the use of NO for bacterial eradiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据