4.6 Article

Corn Husk Phenolics Modulate Hepatic Antioxidant Response in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Exposed to Hypoxia

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 26, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26206161

关键词

antioxidant enzymes; phenolic compounds; corn by-product

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (FORDECYT) [292474]
  2. Fondo Mixto CONACYT Gobierno del Estado de Nayarit [FOMIX NAY-2018-01-02-130685]
  3. Catedras-CONACYT [729]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that CHM dietary supplementation in Nile tilapia exposed to hypoxia can promote antioxidant response through CAT modulation, with no significant effects on growth and feed efficiency.
The hypoxia conditions in intensive farming systems generate oxidative stress related to oxidative damage and mortality of fish. Corn husk meal (CHM), as a source of antioxidants, might modulate the antioxidant response and prevent the damage elicited by hypoxia. This study evaluated CHM's ability to modulate a hepatic response in Nile tilapia exposed to hypoxia. A control and a test diet supplemented with 25 g CHM/kg feed were formulated. Ninety Nile tilapias (5.09 & PLUSMN; 0.55 g initial weight) were fed for 36 days to evaluate growth, feed efficiency, and hepatic antioxidant response (CAT, catalase; SOD, superoxide dismutase, and GPx, glutathione peroxidase) in normal oxygen conditions (normoxia). After the feeding trial (36 days), fish were exposed to hypoxia (1.5 & PLUSMN; 0.2 mg/L dissolved oxygen), and the hepatic antioxidant response was determined. There was no significant effect of CHM on growth and feed efficiency. The CAT activity was significantly increased in tilapias exposed to hypoxia and fed the test diet compared to the control group exposed to hypoxia. The SOD and GPx activities were unchanged in tilapias in normoxia and hypoxia conditions. Results suggest that CHM dietary supplementation promotes the antioxidant response in Nile tilapia exposed to hypoxia through CAT modulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据