4.6 Article

Hexaconazole-Micelle Nanodelivery System Prepared Using Different Surfactants for Ganoderma Antifungal Application

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 26, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26195837

关键词

hexaconazole; surfactants; micelle; antifungal; nanodelivery; stability

资金

  1. Universiti Putra Malaysia
  2. Ministry of Higher Education of Malaysia (UPM-MOHE) [9443100, 5526300]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the potential of fungicide nanodelivery agents based on hexaconazole-micelle systems for combating basal stem rot disease in the oil palm industry, with Tween 80 showing the lowest effective concentration for inhibiting the growth of Ganoderma boninense fungi compared to other surfactants. This research suggests a new generation of agronanofungicide with better efficacy for Ganoderma disease treatment.
Reports on fungicide-based agronanochemicals in combating disastrous basal stem rot disease in the oil palm industry are scant. Herein, we describe the potential of fungicide nanodelivery agents based on hexaconazole-micelle systems produced using three different surfactants; sodium dodecylbenze sulfonate (SDBS), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and Tween 80 (T80). The resulting nanodelivery systems were characterized and the results supported the encapsulation of the fungicide into the micelles of the surfactants. We have investigated in detail the size-dependent effects of the as-synthesized micelles towards the inhibition growth of Ganoderma Boninense fungi. All the nanodelivery systems indicate that their size decreased as the surfactant concentration was increased, and it directly affects the fungal inhibition. It was also found that Tween 80, a non-ionic surfactant gave the lowest effective concentration, the EC50 value of 2, on the pathogenic fungus Ganoderma boninense compared to the other anionic surfactants; SDBS and SDS. This study opens up a new generation of agronanofungicide of better efficacy for Ganoderma disease treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据