4.6 Article

A Combined Deep Eutectic Solvent-Ionic Liquid Process for the Extraction and Separation of Platinum Group Metals (Pt, Pd, Rh)

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 26, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26237204

关键词

ionic liquids; deep eutectic solvents; platinum group metals; recycling; extraction

资金

  1. European Union [730224]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers are increasingly interested in using phosphonium-based ionic liquids for the extraction and separation of platinum group metals, with promising candidates such as P66614Cl and P(66614)B2EHP showing the ability to quantitatively extract Pt, Pd, and Rh from mixed model solutions.
Recovery of platinum group metals from spent materials is becoming increasingly relevant due to the high value of these metals and their progressive depletion. In recent years, there is an increased interest in developing alternative and more environmentally benign processes for the recovery of platinum group metals, in line with the increased focus on a sustainable future. To this end, ionic liquids are increasingly investigated as promising candidates that can replace state-of-the-art approaches. Specifically, phosphonium-based ionic liquids have been extensively investigated for the extraction and separation of platinum group metals. In this paper, we present the extraction capacity of several phosphonium-based ionic liquids for platinum group metals from model deep eutectic solvent-based acidic solutions. The most promising candidates, P66614Cl and P(66614)B2EHP, which exhibited the ability to extract Pt, Pd, and Rh quantitively from a mixed model solution, were additionally evaluated for their capacity to recover these metals from a spent car catalyst previously leached into a choline-based deep eutectic solvent. Specifically, P66614Cl afforded extraction of the three target precious metals from the leachate, while their partial separation from the interfering Al was also achieved since a significant amount (approx. 80%) remained in the leachate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据