4.6 Article

Synthesis and Toxicity Evaluation of New Pyrroles Obtained by the Reaction of Activated Alkynes with 1-Methyl-3-(cyanomethyl)benzimidazolium Bromide

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 26, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26216435

关键词

benzimidazolium bromide; alkynes; 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition; pyrroles; X-ray diffraction; toxicity evaluation

资金

  1. Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of new pyrrole derivatives were designed as chemical analogs of 1,4-dihydropyridines drugs to develop future new calcium channel blockers. The compounds showed minimal phytotoxicity on Triticum rootlets and induced moderate to high toxicity on Daphnia magna, similar to nifedipine. The newly synthesized pyrrole derivatives are promising molecules with biological activity and low acute toxicity.
A series of new pyrrole derivatives were designed as chemical analogs of the 1,4-dihydropyridines drugs in order to develop future new calcium channel blockers. The new tri- and tetra-substituted N-arylpyrroles were synthesized by the one-pot reaction of 1-methyl-3-cyanomethyl benzimidazolium bromide with substituted alkynes having at least one electron-withdrawing substituent, in 1,2-epoxybutane, acting both as the solvent and reagent to generate the corresponding benzimidazolium N3-ylide. The structural characterization of the new substituted pyrroles was based on IR, NMR spectroscopy as well as on single crystal X-ray analysis. The toxicity of the new compounds was assessed on the plant cell using Triticum aestivum L. species and on the animal cell using Artemia franciscana Kellogg and Daphnia magna Straus crustaceans. The compounds showed minimal phytotoxicity on Triticum rootlets and virtually no acute toxicity on Artemia nauplii, while on Daphnia magna, it induced moderate to high toxicity, similar to nifedipine. Our research indicates that the newly synthetized pyrrole derivatives are promising molecules with biological activity and low acute toxicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据