4.6 Review

Recent Analytical Approaches for the Study of Bioavailability and Metabolism of Bioactive Phenolic Compounds

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules27030777

关键词

analytical chemistry; bioactive compounds; bioavailability; metabolism; phytochemicals; phenolic compounds; metabolomics; chromatography; mass spectrometry; untargeted

资金

  1. Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities [RTI2018-096724-B-C22]
  2. Regional Government of Andalusia [A-AGR-226-UGR20]
  3. [P18-TP-3589]
  4. [AGR274]
  5. [265]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study of bioavailability of bioactive compounds is crucial for the development of applications. Recent advances in analytical chemistry and metabolomics have contributed to the understanding of the metabolism and bioavailability of phenolic and terpenoid compounds. This review highlights the role of analytical chemistry and metabolomics in this field, detailing the different steps of the analytical chemistry workflow and presenting the most relevant results obtained.
The study of the bioavailability of bioactive compounds is a fundamental step for the development of applications based on them, such as nutraceuticals, functional foods or cosmeceuticals. It is well-known that these compounds can undergo metabolic reactions before reaching therapeutic targets, which may also affect their bioactivity and possible applications. All recent studies that have focused on bioavailability and metabolism of phenolic and terpenoid compounds have been developed because of the advances in analytical chemistry and metabolomics approaches. The purpose of this review is to show the role of analytical chemistry and metabolomics in this field of knowledge. In this context, the different steps of the analytical chemistry workflow (design study, sample treatment, analytical techniques and data processing) applied in bioavailability and metabolism in vivo studies are detailed, as well as the most relevant results obtained from them.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据