4.6 Article

Chemical and Physical Characterisation of Macroaggregated Human Serum Albumin: Strength and Specificity of Bonds with 99mTc and 68Ga

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 27, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules27020404

关键词

radiopharmaceutical; PET; SPECT; macroaggregated; human serum albumin; Tc-99m; Ga-68

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to improve the understanding of the properties of macroaggregated human serum albumin (MAA), including its morphology, size, dimension, and physical-chemical characteristics, as well as its bond with Tc-99m and Ga-68. The results show that MAA has a dimension range of 43-51 μm and can be efficiently radiolabelled without discrimination of different radioisotopes.
Background: Macroaggregated human serum albumin (MAA) properties are widely used in nuclear medicine, labelled with Tc-99m. The aim of this study is to improve the knowledge about the morphology, size, dimension and physical-chemical characteristics of MAA and their bond with Tc-99m and Ga-68. Methods: Commercial kits of MAA (Pulmocis(R)) were used. Characterisation through experiments based on SEM, DLS and Stokes' Law were carried out. In vitro experiments for Langmuir isotherms and pH studies on radiolabelling were performed and the stability of the radiometal complex was verified through competition reactions. Results: The study settles the MAA dimension within the range 43-51 mu m. The Langmuir isotherm reveals for [Tc-99m]MAA: Bmax (46.32), h (2.36); for [Ga-68]MAA: Bmax (44.54), h (0.893). Dual labelling reveals that MAA does not discriminate different radioisotopes. Experiments on pH placed the optimal pH for labelling with Tc-99m at 6. Conclusion: Radiolabelling of MAA is possible with high efficiency. The nondiscriminatory MAA bonds make this drug suitable for radiolabelling with different radioisotopes or for dual labelling. This finding illustrates the need to continue investigating MAA chemical and physical characteristics to allow for secure labelling with different isotopes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据