4.6 Article

Effect of Plasma Activated Water on Selected Chemical Compounds of Rocket-Salad (Eruca sativa Mill.) Leaves

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 26, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26247691

关键词

plasma activated water; arugula; rocket volatile profile; phytosterols; beta carotene; luteolin; chlorophyll a; chlorophyll b

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PAW treatment has been shown to cause changes in the volatile compounds, phytosterols, and pigment content of rocket leaves. Shorter PAW treatment times can significantly increase certain compounds, while PAW-10 and -2 were closer to the control group. Overall, PAW is a safe alternative for rocket leaf decontamination, with certain compounds showing significant changes after treatment.
Plasma activated water (PAW) has proven to be a promising alternative for the decontamination of rocket leaves. The impact of PAW on the volatile profile, phytosterols, and pigment content of rocket leaves was studied. Leaves were treated by PAW at different times (2, 5, 10, and 20 min). Compounds of the headspace were detected and quantified using GC-MS analysis. A total of 52 volatile organic compounds of different chemical classes were identified. Glucosinolate hydrolysis products are the major chemical class. PAW application induced some chemical modifications in the volatile compounds. Changes in the content of the major compounds varied with the increase or decrease in the treatment time. However, PAW-10 and -2 were grouped closely to the control. A significant decrease in the content of beta-sitosterol and campesterol was observed after PAW treatment, except for PAW-10, which showed a non-significant reduction in both compounds. A significant increase in beta carotene, luteolin, and chlorophyll b was observed after the shortest treatment time of PAW-2. A reduction in chlorophyll content was also observed, which is significant only at longer treatment, or PAW-20. Overall, PAW has proven to be a safe alternative for rocket decontamination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据