4.6 Article

The Inducible Intein-Mediated Self-Cleaving Tag (IIST) System: A Novel Purification and Amidation System for Peptides and Proteins

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 26, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26195948

关键词

halophilic intein; NMR; protein splicing; conditional protein splicing; C-terminal amidation; isotopic labeling; peptide purification; purification tag; self-cleaving tag

资金

  1. TEKES [1311/31/2014]
  2. Academy of Finland [131413, 137995, 277335]
  3. TaNeDS Europe 2017 grant program
  4. Novo Nordisk Foundation [NNF17OC0027550]
  5. Proteomics Unit at the Institute of Biotechnology
  6. Academy of Finland (AKA) [131413, 131413] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces an IIST system based on salt-inducible conditional protein splicing using the intein from Halorhabdus utahensis for purification of small peptides. It also describes a method for amidation and N-15 labeling of a single domain antibody using the same system.
An efficient self-cleavable purification tag could be a powerful tool for purifying recombinant proteins and peptides without additional proteolytic processes using specific proteases. Thus, the intein-mediated self-cleavage tag was developed and has been commercially available as the IMPACT (TM) system. However, uncontrolled cleavages of the purification tag by the inteins in the IMPACT (TM) system have been reported, thereby reducing final yields. Therefore, controlling the protein-splicing activity of inteins has become critical. Here we utilized conditional protein splicing by salt conditions. We developed the inducible intein-mediated self-cleaving tag (IIST) system based on salt-inducible protein splicing of the MCM2 intein from the extremely halophilic archaeon, Halorhabdus utahensis and applied it to small peptides. Moreover, we described a method for the amidation using the same IIST system and demonstrated N-15-labeling of the C-terminal amide group of a single domain antibody (V-HH).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据