4.6 Review

The Application of Nitric Oxide for Ocular Hypertension Treatment

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 26, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26237306

关键词

glaucoma; conventional outflow system; intraocular pressure; NO donors

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation China [82070959, 81790641, 82030027]
  2. Shanghai Natural Science Fund General Project [21ZR1411500]
  3. Individualized support project for original scientific research of Fudan University [IDF158017/005]
  4. International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of China [2015DFA31340]
  5. BrightFocus Foundation [G2018112]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite various therapeutic methods for ocular hypertension and glaucoma, lowering intraocular pressure remains the most effective way to slow disease progression and prevent blindness. Only a couple of ocular hypotensive drugs act on the conventional outflow system, which is the main pathway for aqueous humor outflow and the major lesion site causing ocular hypertension.
Despite of various therapeutic methods for treating ocular hypertension and glaucoma, it still remains the leading cause of irreversible blindness. Intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering is the most effective way to slow disease progression and prevent blindness. Among the ocular hypotensive drugs currently in use, only a couple act on the conventional outflow system, which is the main pathway for aqueous humor outflow and the major lesion site resulting in ocular hypertension. Nitric oxide (NO) is a commendable new class of glaucoma drugs that acts on the conventional outflow pathway. An increasing number of nitric oxide donors have been developed for glaucoma and ocular hypertension treatment. Here, we will review how NO lowers IOP and the types of nitric oxide donors that have been developed. And a brief analysis of the advantages and challenges associated with the application will be made. The literature used in this review is based on Pubmed database search using 'nitric oxide' and 'glaucoma' as key words.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据