4.6 Article

Comparative Thermal Research on Energetic Molecular Perovskite Structures

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules27030805

关键词

confined effect; decomposition mechanisms; DSC-TG-FTIR-MS quadruple technology; molecular perovskites; thermal research

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21805226, 21805223]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducted a comparative thermal research on molecular perovskite structures and investigated the factors influencing their thermal decomposition. The results showed that the choice of organic component and the substitution of cations can affect the stability and decomposition temperature of molecular perovskites. Furthermore, the kinetic parameters and synergistic catalysis mechanism of perovskite decomposition were studied using experimental and computational methods.
Molecular perovskites are promising practicable energetic materials with easy access and outstanding performances. Herein, we reported the first comparative thermal research on energetic molecular perovskite structures of (C6H14N2)[NH4(ClO4)(3)], (C6H14N2)[Na(ClO4)(3)], and (C6H14ON2)[NH4(ClO4)(3)] through both calculation and experimental methods with different heating rates such as 2, 5, 10, and 20 degrees C/min. The peak temperature of thermal decompositions of (C6H14ON2)[NH4(ClO4)(3)] and (C6H14N2) [Na(ClO4)(3)] were 384 and 354 degrees C at the heating rate of 10 degrees C/min, which are lower than that of (C6H14N2)[NH4(ClO4)(3)] (401 degrees C). The choice of organic component with larger molecular volume, as well as the replacement of ammonium cation by alkali cation weakened the cubic cage skeletons; meanwhile, corresponding kinetic parameters were calculated with thermokinetics software. The synergistic catalysis thermal decomposition mechanisms of the molecular perovskites were also investigated based on condensed-phase thermolysis/Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy method and DSC-TG-FTIR-MS quadruple technology at different temperatures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据