4.4 Article

Dietary Omega-3 Fatty Acids Increase Survival and Decrease Bacterial Load in Mice Subjected to Staphylococcus aureus-Induced Sepsis

期刊

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
卷 84, 期 4, 页码 1205-1213

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01391-15

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council [K2013 54X 09894 19 3, 2667]
  2. Swedish Society for Medical Research
  3. Sahlgrenska Center for Cardiovascular Metabolic Research (CMR) [A305: 188]
  4. Swedish Strategic Foundation
  5. EC [Full4Health FP7-KBBE-2010 - 4-266408]
  6. Magnus Bergvall Foundation
  7. Langmanska Kulturfonden
  8. Stiftelsen Gamla trotjanarinnor
  9. OE och Edla Johanssons vetenskapliga Stiftelse
  10. Lars Hiertas Foundation
  11. Ake Wiberg Foundation
  12. Stiftelsen Tornspiran

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sepsis caused by Staphylococcus aureus is increasing in incidence. With the alarming use of antibiotics, S. aureus is prone to become methicillin resistant. Antibiotics are the only widely used pharmacological treatment for sepsis. Interestingly, mice fed high-fat diet (HFD) rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids have better survival of S. aureus-induced sepsis than mice fed HFD rich in saturated fatty acids (HFD-S). To investigate what component of polyunsaturated fatty acids, i.e., omega-3 or omega-6 fatty acids, exerts beneficial effects on the survival of S. aureus-induced sepsis, mice were fed HFD rich in omega-3 or omega-6 fatty acids for 8 weeks prior to inoculation with S. aureus. Further, mice fed HFD-S were treated with omega-3 fatty acid metabolites known as resolvins. Mice fed HFD rich in omega-3 fatty acids had increased survival and decreased bacterial loads compared to those for mice fed HFD-S after S. aureus-induced sepsis. Furthermore, the bacterial load was decreased in resolvin-treated mice fed HFD-S after S. aureus-induced sepsis compared with that in mice treated with vehicle. Dietary omega-3 fatty acids increase the survival of S. aureus-induced sepsis by reversing the deleterious effect of HFD-S on mouse survival.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据