4.7 Article

Liquid profiling of circulating tumor DNA in colorectal cancer: steps needed to achieve its full clinical value as standard care

期刊

MOLECULAR ONCOLOGY
卷 16, 期 10, 页码 2042-2056

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13156

关键词

colorectal cancer; ctDNA; liquid biopsy; liquid profiling; real-world

类别

资金

  1. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is close to being implemented into standard care for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, but there are limitations and challenges that need to be addressed. While the results show improved request behavior and reliable diagnostic performance of liquid profiling (LP), there are still issues such as lack of clinically relevant ctDNA thresholds and appropriate time points for LP requests.
The analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is at the threshold of implementation into standard care for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. However, data about the clinical utility of liquid profiling (LP), its acceptance by clinicians, and its integration into clinical workflows in real-world settings remain limited. Here, LP tests requested as part of routine care since 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Results show restrained request behavior that improved moderately over time, as well as reliable diagnostic performance comparable to translational studies, with an overall agreement of 91.7%. Extremely low ctDNA levels at < 0.1% in over 20% of cases, a high frequency of concomitant driver mutations (in up to 14% of cases), and ctDNA levels reflecting the clinical course of disease were revealed. However, certain limitations hampering successful translation of ctDNA into clinical practice were uncovered, including the lack of clinically relevant ctDNA thresholds, appropriate time points of LP requests, and integrative evaluation of ctDNA, imaging, and clinical findings. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential clinical value of LP for CRC patient management and demonstrate issues that need to be addressed for successful long-term implementation in clinical workflows.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据