4.7 Article

Resveratrol Improves Follicular Development of PCOS Rats by Regulating the Glycolytic Pathway

期刊

MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH
卷 65, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.202100457

关键词

glycolysis; lactate; PCOS; resveratrol; SIRT2

资金

  1. China National Natural Science Fund [81860733]
  2. Yueyang Maternal and Child Health Hospital Horizontal Cooperation Project [19yyfyhx001]
  3. Hunan Natural Science Foundation Youth Project [2020JJ5500]
  4. Key Lab for Clinical Anatomy & Reproductive Medicine of Hengyang City [2017KJ182]
  5. National Training Program of Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Undergraduates [S202010555239]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study discovered that resveratrol can protect the ovaries of PCOS rats by restoring glycolytic activity, providing potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of PCOS.
Scope Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine and metabolic disorder that can cause infertility; however, the underlying mechanisms remain ill-defined, and there are no available drugs or strategies for the treatment of PCOS. This study examined the therapeutic effect of resveratrol in a rat model of PCOS. Methods and Results PCOS is induced in rats by administration of letrozole and a high fat diet to determine whether resveratrol has a protective effect. Oral administration of resveratrol significantly decreased body weight, as well as the serum levels of testosterone and follicle stimulating hormone. Resveratrol improved the estrous cycle by restoring the thickness and number of granular cells. Resveratrol increased the levels of lactate and ATP, decreased pyruvate levels, and restored the glycolytic process, upregulating LDHA, HK2, and PKM2. Resveratrol also upregulated SIRT2, thereby modulating the expression of rate-limiting enzymes of glycolysis. Conclusion Resveratrol suppressed damage to the ovaries in PCOS rats by restoring glycolytic activity, providing potential targets for the treatment of PCOS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据